|
(WOMENSENEWS)--Charles Darwin's famous theory of natural
selection--which he began to develop in the 1830s--may still be
widely accepted as an explanation for how species are related and
what causes them to change over time. Biologists, however, are
beginning to pick apart another of his evolutionary
premises--sexual-selection theory--and say it deserves to be
rethought and perhaps discarded altogether.
The key idea of sexual-selection theory is based on the idea
that females' way of choosing mates
can influence male traits and that this selection process can
explain a great deal of sexual behavior. Darwin formulated
sexual-selection theory in part to explain questions raised by
elaborate and bizarre sex behavior. For instance, why do peacocks
brandish their plumage when such bright displays could attract
predators? Darwin's answer: Evolution of showy male traits is
justified when those traits increase the chances of carrying genes
forward, even if the feathers eventually attract a fox rather than a
pea hen.
But while sexual-selection theory justifies some mating behaviors
it by no means explains all of them, says Joan Roughgarden, a
professor of biological science at Stanford University, Stanford,
Calif. The evidence for diversity of sex, gender expression and
sexuality in nature are extensive, she says. Continuing to overlook
the flaws in Darwin's sexual-selection theory, she continues, will
eventually undercut and endanger confidence in the rest of Darwin's
work, which has stood up to extensive scrutiny.
By ignoring the abundant challenges to Darwin's sexual-selection
theory in nature, overlooked is evidence that sexual behavior often
doesn't match gender and that many species exhibit flexible sexual
expression.
Male-Female 'Binary' Is Challenged
"The biggest mistake in biology today," said Roughgarden, "is
extending the idea of the gametic binary to both behavior and life
history." (Gametic binary is the premise that there are only two
sexes, male and female, and by extension just two genders, masculine
and feminine.)
However, many plant and animal species make both eggs and sperm
during their lifetimes, making the idea of distinct "male" and
"female" bodies untenable. In fact, says Robert Warner, professor of
marine ecology at the University of California at Santa Barbara,
many animals and plants function as both sexes at the same time, and
some, like the hamlet fish, can change sex as conditions change, in
a matter of minutes.
In addition, nature produces societies with up to three male and
two female genders. For example, there are three types of male
bluegill sunfish, all different in size and appearance. A
"controller male" attracts females to a territory, an "end-runner"
male curtails the controller's monopoly by intercepting and
fertilizing eggs, and a "feminine male" helps facilitate mating. All
fertilize some eggs and their multi-gendered society continues.
"Gender is surprisingly labile and is not solely determined by
the gametes a creature happens to produce," said Warner. It is more
useful to think of sex as tactical: in other words, sexual
expression can vary depending on factors such as an animal's
parents, environment and social circumstances, he says. "There is
incredible diversity of sexual expression out there," said Warner,
"and while it is predictable, it is not as simple as Darwin might
have imagined."
Gender Does Not Dictate Sexual Behavior
Patricia Adair Gowaty is an ecologist at the University of
Georgia, Athens, who argues that it is almost impossible to draw
definitive conclusions about mate selection from existing studies.
"We need research that asks the same questions of males and females
in the same species," she said. "Do females approach males and can
males be choosy too?"
Yes, and yes, she found.
She conducted two kinds of experiments, the results of which she
presented earlier this year. In one, she placed one male and one
female fruit fly in a vial and noted who went toward whom. Standard
sexual-selection theory predicts that males are the ardent ones. Her
results defied this however. She observed that females were often as
interested in the males as the males were in the females.
"In the second set of experiments," she said, "we placed either
flies or mice in a three-armed arena so that choosers could get a
look-smell-hear of the two opposite-sex individuals. Again, standard
sexual-selection theory predicted that female choosers would be
picky and male choosers would be indiscriminate. But we found that
in both flies and mice there were no differences in choosy or
indiscriminate behavior by sex," she said.
Gender, which originates in the gonads, does not equal sexuality,
which is a product of the brain, says David Crews of the University
of Texas at Austin. The study of gonadal sex influences, but does
not explain, sexuality, he says. Sexuality emerges from a different
process, resulting from genes, but also hormones, physiological
conditions such as the health of the pregnant mother, maternal care
during infancy and accumulation of life experience.
Broader Role of Sexual Intercourse
Roughgarden says that sexual intercourse has social
roles--managing power, negotiating for resources--as well as a
reproductive one. She proposes a new theory she terms "social
inclusionary selection." This concept encompasses Darwin's idea that
female choice can influence male traits, and that sexual selection
does exist. However, it reaches beyond his theory by incorporating
the enormous diversity in how sex, gender and sexuality are
expressed.
There are many examples of same-sex sexual activity in animals,
including humans, which Darwin noted but did not explain. Paul L.
Vasey's studies in the past few years of Japanese macaque monkeys at
the University of Lethbridge in Canada suggest that animals may
sometimes choose mates that don't have reproductive value, i.e.,
whom they can't impregnate or become pregnant by.
While Darwin posited that males compete among themselves for
access to female mates, Vasey observed that both males and females
compete to have sex with other female macaques. He set up tests that
ruled out functional explanations for their homosexual behavior such
as easing social tension or attracting male mates. Instead, the
activity appears to be for sexual reward. Female macaques masturbate
by mounting each other, in this way cooperating for pleasure. They
almost never masturbate in any other context.
Although challenges to sexual selection theory are widely
documented, the flaws are rarely included in biology classes, nature
programming or zoos. Instead a contradiction is perpetuated: on the
one hand females are choosy about mates so that they can select the
best genes; on the other, broad genetic diversity ensures a species'
long-term survival.
Roughgarden asserts that this contradiction suggests females seek
either elite or diverse genes. Nature points to more wide-ranging
conduct. Educators should teach the broader reality of sexual
behavior, she says. "It's about time criticism of sexual-selection
theory was carried forward by women scientists."
Kathleen Nelson is a freelance journalist in New York
City.
Copyright 2003 Women's eNews
|